Theorem 1
(the Laplace transform of the first derivative of )
Suppose:
(1) is continuous on some interval and of exponential order
; and
(2) is piecewise continuous on some interval.
Then exists for
and
Proof
First, by definition, we write
Next, we need to evaluate the definite integral . Because
is piecewise continuous on
, we can partition
by a finite number of points
, in each of which
is continuous. Thus, the integral is
Therefore,
The integral in the third term is, by definition, the Laplace transform of . We still need to examine if the limit in the first term exists as
.
Because is of exponential
, there exists
, such that
for
, which implies
Take
When , we see that
, and
, and thus
.
Finally, we confirm exists for
and
◪
Theorem 2
(the Laplace transform of the th derivative of
)
Suppose: (1) are continuous on some interval and of exponential order
; and (2)
is piecewise continuous on some interval.
Then exists for
and
Proof
◪
Example 1
Solve the I.V.P.
Solution
Take on both sides of the equation
Letting and substituting the initial conditions
into the above transformed equation gives
which is an algebraic equation with the solution
This is a fraction and it is not easy to find its inverse Laplace transform directly. But the denominator can be factorized into
. So we use the method of partial fraction decomposition by letting
so that , which leads to
. Thus,
Note that this differential equation is linear and homogeneous and thus can be immediately solved by writing its characteristic equation, which is more convenient. But we’ll see the utility of the Laplace transform later. ❏
Example 2
Solve the I.V.P.
Solution
Take on both sides of the equation and let
:
We use the method of partial fraction decomposition by letting
so that , which leads to
and then
Such fractions are recognizable — they are the Laplace transform of sine and cosine functions. Taking the inverse Laplace transform, we have
Note that this differential equation is as well applicable to the theory of linear homogeneous equations; and the particular solution can be solved by the method of undetermined coefficients. ❏
Theorem 3
(translation of )
Supposed the function is such that
exists for
, then
.
Proof
◪
Example 3
Find .
Solution
We compare this form with the formula in Theorem 3 and see that . Since we know
so we have
❏
Example 4
Find .
Solution
We complete the square for denominator,
and compare this form with the formula in Theorem 3 and see that . Since we know
so we have
❏
Theorem 4
(differentiation of )
Supposed the function is such that
exists for
, then
.
Proof
We repeatedly diffentiate :
By the mathematical induction, we can prove that
❏
Example 5
Find .
Solution
We compare this form with the formula in Theorem 3 and see that . Since we know
so we have
❏